Horticultural Sciences Department

A Vegetable Crops Extension Publication

Archives
Events Calendar
Index
Related Links

_____________________

Anyone is free to use the information in this newsletter. Whenever possible, please give credit to the authors.
The purpose of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing information and does not necessarily constitute a recommendation of the product.)


Webmaster - Susie Lonon

 

veggies growing.gif (7628 bytes)   Vegetarian Newsletter

A Vegetable Crops Extension Publication
Vegetarian 01-09
September 2001

University of Florida
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service

(Note: Anyone is free to use the information in this newsletter. Whenever possible, please give credit to the authors.
The purpose of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing information and does not necessarily constitute a recommendation of the product.)

EVENTS CALENDER
grnbullet.gif (839 bytes) 2001 Florida Postharvest Horticulture Institute at FACTS

COMMERCIAL VEGETABLES
grnbullet.gif (839 bytes) Effect of Different Within-row Plant Spacings on Yield and Ear Characteristics
of Sweet Corn Grown on Muck Soil, Belle Glade, FL, Spring, 2001

grnbullet.gif (839 bytes) Florida Greenhouse Vegetable Survey Update
grnbullet.gif (839 bytes) Severe Root Pruning of Strawberry Bareroot Transplants Has No Effect on Yield
grnbullet.gif (839 bytes) Scheduling Drip-irrigation for Watermelon

VEGETABLE GARDENING
grnbullet.gif (839 bytes)
History of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida

List of Extension Vegetable Crops Specialists

calender butt.jpg (2719 bytes)

Florida Agriculture Extension Professionals Meeting - Sept. 10-14.
FACTS Meeting - Oct. 2-3 - Lakeland, FL.
2001 Florida Postharvest Horticulture Institute at FACTS - Oct. 2-3 - Lakeland, FL. Contact Steve Sargent, 352-392-1928 x215, sasa@mail.ifas.ufl.edu. This year's topic, "Sanitation and Food Safety: Protecting Produce and People" will feature Dr. Jim Gorny, Technical Director, International Fresh-cut Processors Association, and UF/IFAS extension specialists in lecture and hands-on/demonstration formats.
Cucurbitaceae 2002 - Dec. 8-12, 2002 - Naples Beach and Golf Club, Naples, FL. Contact Donald N. Maynard at (941)751-7636 x239 or dnma@mail.ifas.ufl.edu.

2001 Florida Postharvest Horticulture Institute at FACTS

"Sanitation and Food Safety: Protecting Produce and People"

The 11th annual Florida Postharvest Horticulture Institute will be held at FACTS 2001 (Florida Agriculture Conference & Trade Show) on October 2 and 3 at The Lakeland Center in Lakeland, Florida. The program will feature Dr. Jim Gorny, Technical Director for the International Fresh-Cut Produce Association, as well as other leading experts who will present the latest practical information for minimizing the risk of microbial contamination of fresh fruits and vegetables during harvesting, packing and shipping operations.

The Postharvest Institute is designed for produce industry professionals, educators, researchers and students involved in such diverse areas as field and packinghouse management, wholesale and retail sales and import/export. The $40.00 registration fee covers admission to the Institute, lunch on Tuesday, a reference notebook and entrance to the FACTS exhibit areas. A discounted registration fee is available for county faculty who wish to participate.

For more information, contact Ms. Abbie Fox, Institute Facilitator at 352-392-1928, ext. 235 or by e-mail at ajfox@mail.ifas.ufl.edu.

Periodic updated information is available on the homepage of the Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida at: www.hos.ufl.edu.

This program is co-sponsored by the Horticultural Sciences Department and the Cooperative Extension Service, University of Florida; the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Orlando; and FACTS 2001.

(Sargent, Vegetarian 01-09)

comm veg butt.jpg (5124 bytes)

Effect of Different Within-row Plant Spacings on Yield and Ear Characteristics of Sweet Corn Grown on Muck Soil, Belle Glade, FL, Spring, 2001

Purpose: During the spring season, it is not unusual for growers to produce very large ears of sweet corn which do not readily fit into the standard sized crate. Growers must often use a larger crate and still may have difficulty or not be able to get the desired 54 to 60 ears into the crate. This demonstration was conducted to determine if planting large eared varieties of corn closer together (increase plant population and reduce within-row plant spacing) would help reduce ear size so that ears would more easily fit into the crate while at the same time increase overall marketable yield. How close can large eared sweet corn varieties be planted in the spring to increase yield while still retaining acceptable ear qualities?

Experimental Design: Three varieties of sweet corn were replicated in a split block design with four plant spacings and four replications. Abbott & Cobb 945 and Rogers 9686 were selected by the respective seed companies. The third variety, Abbott & Cobb Summer sweet 8102 BC, was being planted commercially by the grower in the same field. Plots were single rows spaced 30 inches apart. A total of 30 hills were direct seeded with a jabber for each spacing and plots were separated by a 3 ft planted border to reduce any end-of-plot effects. Plot length varied according to within-row plant spacing.

Spacing Treatments:

Within-row spacing (in.)

Length of plot (feet)

Plants per acre

6

15

34,848

7

17.5

29,870

8

20

26,136

9

22.5

23,232

Location and Soil Type: Prewitt Village, 4 miles east of Belle Glade, FL,: Pahokee muck.

Planted: 22 February, 2001

Mid-silk: 15 - 21 April (52 to 58 days after planting)

Harvested: 8 - 11 May (20 to 23 days after mid-silk and 75 to 78 days after planting)

Crop Culture and Evaluation: The demonstration area had been treated with Thimet 20G insecticide over the unplanted seed row and liquid fertilizer had been knifed in about three inches to the side of the unplanted seed row. Using a jabber, one to two seed were planted per hill on 22 Feb. and thinned to one plant on 15 March (21 days after planting). For Rogers 9686 and Abbott & Cobb Summer sweet 8102 BC two seed were planted per hill and for Abbott & Cobb 945, only one seed was planted per hill because of a limited amount of seed. To help determine maturity, ears with silks were counted from all plots on 10 (no silks), 16, and 19 April.

Variety

Spacing

Replication

Mid-silk date

Days to mid-silk

Average days to mid-silk

Harvest date

Days mid-silk to harvest

A&C 945

9"

1, 2

15 Apr

52

52.5

8 May

22.5

8"

2

15 Apr

52

52.75

8 May

22.25

7"

1,2,3,4

16 Apr

53

53

8 May

22

6"

1,2,3,4

16 Apr

53

53

9 May

23

Rogers 9686

9"

1, 2, 3

17 Apr

54

54.75

9 May

21.75

8"

3

17 Apr

54

55.5

9 May

21.5

7"

2, 3

18 Apr

55

55.75

10 May

21.75

6"

2, 3

18 Apr

55

55.75

10 May

21.75

Sweet 8102 BC

9"

1

15 Apr

52

54.75

8 May

22

8"

1

17 Apr

54

55.5

9 May

21.75

7"

1, 2, 4

18 Apr

55

55.25

10 May

21.75

6"

4

18 Apr

55

55.75

10 May

22

Height to the top of the top ear was measured on 8 May before any plots were harvested.(from the top of soil hilled up around the stalks by the layby cultivation). At harvest plants were evaluated for leaning and lodging. All top ears from each plot were picked, and 10 ears were selected at random to be husked for further evaluation. The marketability of all ears was judged by feel and any questionable ears were husked to check maturity, length, and tip fill. All ears were weighed together and the 10 ears selected for further evaluation were weighed separately so that husked weight could be compared with unhusked weight. The 10 selected ears were husked and evaluated for husk cover; minimum, maximum, and median ear length; ear width; minimum, maximum, and average amount of unfilled tip.

Weather and Crop Conditions: Weather was dry but fairly favorable for crop growth. Rainfall for the 78 day crop period was estimated at 5.09 inches (based on the average daily rainfall totals for the two closest SFWMD rain gauge sites). Some rust and Northern corn leaf blight was noticed when the plots were checked on 16 April.

Results and Discussion: Bird damage was noted around the ear tip and sides of some ears of A&C 945, the earliest maturing variety. The 10 ears for quality evaluation were selected from undamaged ears. The desired plant population was most closely achieved for Abbott & Cobb Ss 8102 BC and Rogers 9686. For Abbott & Cobb 945, the actual plant population was 10 to 13% below what was desired. (Note: Abbott & Cobb 945 was planted one seed per hill, while the other two varieties were planted at two seed per hill and thinned to one plant.)

Following are the acceptable plant spacings and the subsequent yield for each variety based on the following criteria (Table1): 1) the crate must contain 54 to 60 ears, 2) the crate must weigh a minimum of 42 lbs., and 3) based on the number of ears to weigh 42 lbs., the ear count per crate can not be less that 54 ears.

For A&C 945, the 6 and 7 inch plant spacings yielded ears that weighed less than 42 lbs./crate at 54 and 60 ears/crate. At the 9 inch spacing, both 54 and 60 ear counts weighed more than 42 pounds/crate. The 8 inch spacing was acceptable at 54+ ears with yields ranging from 356 to 395 crates/A.

For A&C Ss 8102 BC, the 6 inch plant spacing yielded ears that weighed less than 42 lbs./crate at 54 and 60 ears/crate. At the 9 inch spacing, only the 60 ear count weighed more than 42 pounds/crate. The 7, 8, and 9 inch spacings were acceptable at 60 ears/crate with yields ranging from 355 to 465 crates/A.

For Rogers 9686, the 6 inch plant spacing yielded ears that weighed less than 42 lbs./crate at 54 and 60 ears/crate. At the 9 inch spacing, both 54 and 60 ear counts weighed more than 42 pounds/crate; also, at the 8 inch spacing, 60 ears/crate weighed more than 42 pounds/crate. The 8 inch spacing was acceptable at 54 ears producing 424 crates/A and the 7 inch spacing was acceptable at 60 ears producing 473 crates/A.

Acceptable sized ears were produced at the following spacings:

Variety

Spacing (inches)

Plants per A

A&C 945

8

26,136

A&C Ss 8102 BC

7, 8, 9

23,231 to 29,870

Rogers 9686

7, 8

26,136 to 29,870

Husk cover was acceptable for all varieties at each of these spacings (Table 2). A&C 945 had the longest average husks length while A&C Ss 8102 BC had the shortest average length. Ear length was acceptable at each of these spacings. A&C Ss 8102 BC had the longest average ear length while A&C 945 had the shortest. The average minimum ear length was 7.0 in. or greater for all except A&C 945, which averaged 6.8 in. for the 8 inch spacing. Ear width was acceptable, averaging 1.75 in. or more for all varieties and spacings except A&C Ss 8102 BC at 7 in. (1.73 in.). When compared over all four spacings (6 to 9 in.), A&C Ss 8102 BC had the smallest variation in ear width, 0.05 in. (ranging from 1.72 to 1.77 in.). A&C 945 had the greatest variation in ear width, 0.12 in. (ranging from 1.70 to 1.82 in.). The amount of unfilled tip was also acceptable for the spacings which produced acceptable sized ears. A&C Ss 8102 BC had the smallest amount of average unfilled tip (0.08 to 0.19 in. for corn spaced at 7 to 9 inches). At the 7 inch spacing, Rogers 9686 had the largest average for high unfilled tip at 1.76 in.

Although the unhusked ear weight of Rogers 9686 was heavier than the other two varieties, it ranked second in husked ear weight and had the lowest percent husked ear weight (Table 3). A&C Ss 8102 BC had the highest ear placement (38.4 in.) and the highest number of lodged stalks (0.38). Row count was not completed for A&C 945 at the 7, 8, and 9 inch spacings. Row count averaged 16 & 18 for Rogers 9686 and 14 and 16 for A&C Ss 8102 BC.

See charts with corresponding data that are indicated in the last row of Tables 1 and 2.

Click for Table 1.

Table 2. Ear characteristics of sweet corn at different within-row plant spacings, R. C. Hatton, Inc., Prewitt Village (USSC), Belle Glade, FL, Spring 2001.

Spacing (inches)

Stalk no.

 

Husk cover (in.)

Ear length (in.)

Width (in.)

Unfilled tip (in.)

 

low

high

avg.

low

high

avg.

low

high

avg.

A&C 945

                     

9

26.5

 

1.31

2.06

1.7

7.1

8.06

7.38

1.82

0

0.86

0.26

8

27

 

1.38

2.2

1.7

6.79

7.98

7.46

1.80

0

0.75

0.28

7

27

 

1.06

1.8

1.5

6.35

7.61

7.24

1.73

0.1

1.36

0.41

6

26

 

1

1.94

1.3

6.28

7.6

7.2

1.70

0.29

1.44

0.78

Rogers 9686

                   

9

29.8

 

0.94

1.88

1.4

7.26

8.06

7.53

1.80

0

0.69

0.15

8

28.3

 

0.95

1.73

1.4

7.1

7.99

7.56

1.79

0

1.2

0.31

7

31

 

0.85

1.88

1.4

7.03

7.95

7.39

1.75

0.08

1.76

0.76

6

30

 

0.88

1.93

1.4

6.89

7.88

7.4

1.73

0.1

1.83

0.89

A&C Ss 8102 BC

                 

9

28.8

 

0.94

1.85

1.4

7.33

8.06

7.49

1.77

0

0.19

0.08

8

30

 

0.71

1.53

1.1

7.34

8.08

7.74

1.75

0

0.5

0.11

7

29.8

 

0.55

1.33

0.9

7.05

8.05

7.64

1.73

0

0.83

0.19

6

29

 

0.45

1.23

0.9

7.14

8.14

7.6

1.72

0

0.84

0.2

Average

                       

9

28.4

 

1.06

1.93

1.5

7.23

8.06

7.47

1.8

0

0.58

0.16

8

28.4

 

1.01

1.82

1.4

7.08

8.02

7.59

1.78

0

0.82

0.23

7

29.3

 

0.82

1.67

1.3

6.81

7.87

7.42

1.73

0.06

1.32

0.45

6

28.3

 

0.78

1.7

1.2

6.77

7.87

7.4

1.72

0.13

1.37

0.62

A&C 945

26.6

 

1.19

2

1.6

6.63

7.81

7.32

1.761

0.1

1.1

0.43

Rogers 9686

29.8

 

0.91

1.86

1.4

7.07

7.97

7.47

1.765

0.05

1.37

0.53

A&C Ss 8102 BC

29.4

 

0.66

1.49

1.1

7.22

8.08

7.62

1.742

0

0.59

0.15

Figure No.     4a 4b 4c 1a 1b 1c 2 3a 3b 3c

 

Table 3. Plant and ear characteristics of sweet corn at different within-row plant spacings, R. C. Hatton, Inc., Prewitt Village (USSC), Belle Glade, FL, Spring 2001.

Spacing
(inches)

 

Row count

Unhusked
wt. (lbs.)z

Husked wt. (lbs.)z

Husked % of unhuskedz

Ear ht. (in.)x

No. lodged

12

14

16

18

20

Avg

A&C 945

                   

9

             

8.22

5

0.61

30.5

0

8

             

7.84

4.71

0.6

29.8

0

7

             

6.94

4.31

0.62

29.9

0

6

 

1

1

7

1

 

15.6

6.59

4.33

0.66

30.1

0

Rogers 9686

                   

9

 

0

0

3

5

2

17.8

8.85

4.92

0.56

37.3

0

8

 

0

0

5

5

0

17

8.12

4.73

0.58

35.4

0

7

 

0

1

5

4

0

16.6

7.28

4.48

0.62

37.6

0.5

6

 

0

3

5

2

0

15.8

6.75

4.33

0.64

38

0

A&C Ss 8102 BC

                 

9

 

2

5

2

1

0

14.4

7.81

4.77

0.61

37

0.25

8

 

0

9

1

0

0

14.2

7.39

4.76

0.64

39

0.5

7

 

0

3

5

2

0

15.8

7.01

4.68

0.67

37.9

0.5

6

 

0

6

3

1

0

15

6.71

4.59

0.68

39.8

0.25

Average

                   

9

 

1

2.5

2.5

3

1

16.1

8.29

4.9

0.59

34.9

0.083

8

 

0

4.5

3

3

0

15.6

7.78

4.73

0.61

34.7

0.167

7

 

0

2

5

3

0

16.2

7.08

4.49

0.64

35.1

0.333

6

 

0

4.5

4

2

0

15.4

6.68

4.42

0.66

36

0.083

A&C 945

Rogers 9686

A&C Ss 8102 BC

           

7.4

4.59

0.62

30.1

0

0

1

4.5

4

1

16.8

7.75

4.62

0.6

37.1

0.13

1

5.8

2.8

1

0

14.9

7.23

4.7

0.65

38.4

0.38

z For the ten ears selected for ear measurements.
y Measured at first harvest (May 8) from the top of the top ear to the top of soil hilled up around the stalks by the layby cultivation.

(Ken Shuler, ext. agt. IV, Palm Beach County - Vegetarian 01-09)

Florida Greenhouse Vegetable Survey Update

Results of 3 surveys on the status of the Florida greenhouse vegetable industry over the last decade were presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the Florida State Horticultural Society. Considerable change has occurred in the industry. Results showed that the amount of acreage devoted to greenhouse production was 66, 58, and 95 acres for the 1991, 1996, and 2001 surveys respectively.

The major crops grown in vegetable greenhouses during the decade changed with European cucumbers the predominant crop in 1991. The 2001 survey ranked colored peppers first, followed by tomatoes, herbs, and European cucumbers (Figure 1). Production systems in use also changed with an increase in perlite and a decline in rockwool systems (Figure 2). New hydroponic systems such as vertical and float production along with older standards like bag/pot and floor/bed systems were all in use during 2001 (Figure 3). Greenhouse design was predominantly multi-bay, double polyethylene plastic covered, with pad and fan systems in 2001 (Figure 4). About one third of the acreage was using natural ventilation.

Greenhouse growers are under significant competitive pressure from imported greenhouse vegetables. Tomato greenhouse growers in the United States recently banded together and brought an anti-dumping complaint against Canada. The U.S. International Trade Commission found sufficient preliminary evidence that Canada was materially harming the U.S. industry by selling their product here at less than fair market value. The investigation is expanding and early bets are that a floor price will be established at $.60 to $.70 cents per pound at the border. With shipping costs added, this should help the Florida tomato growers who market locally compete better with the Canadian product.

Another development which illustrates the rapid changes in the greenhouse industry was the announcement that Burnac’s, one of the largest and oldest greenhouse producers in Florida, will not be putting in a fall crop and is up for sale (28 greenhouse acres). They were producing primarily colored pepper (which will now drop to 4th behind European cucumbers).

The challenge for the Florida greenhouse vegetable industry will be to find ways to reduce the cost per pound to produce greenhouse vegetables and establish reliable markets that are willing to pay more for this quality product. Does that sound like being caught between a rock and a hard place?

(Richard Tyson, ext. agt. II, Seminole County - Vegetarian 01-09)

Severe Root Pruning of Strawberry Bareroot
Transplants Has No Effect on Yield

The adaptability of the strawberry root system promotes transplant establishment. Strawberry plant root size is usually well established within 2 to 3 months of the beginning of the growing season (Galletta, 1990). Rapid growth insures the delivery of water and nutrients at times critical to flower and fruit development. The six-week period just prior to harvest is when strawberry plants accumulate nutrients at the greatest rate. (May, 1994)

Northern latitude or high elevation nurseries produce strawberry transplants during the summer months and begin digging plants in September for Florida’s winter production season. The nurseries are open fields where plants produce daughter plants on stolens (runners) in response to long days and high temperatures. These daughter plants radiate from the mother plants, taking root if soil conditions are suitable. Digging implements are used to loosen the soil around the plants, lift them from the ground, and shake any remaining soil form the roots. The method of digging daughter plants is efficient however the plants experience some damage in the process. The green topped bare root transplants arrive in Florida with varying amounts of root damage and 3-6 mature leaves. These plants are planted on raised, black polyethylene mulch beds and then are overhead irrigated for 10-14 days, 10 hours a day to aid in reestablishment of the root system. The objective of this study was to determine if mechanical root pruning has an effect on early or total season fruit yield of strawberry bareroot transplants grown in a Florida winter production system.

‘Sweet Charlie’ strawberry plants were graded so that all plants were of equal size and apportioned into three groups, with each group containing 64 transplants. The plant roots in the first group were trimmed to 5 cm, the second group’s roots were trimmed to 9 cm, and the third group, which served as the control, had roots that were not trimmed and measured 12 cm or more. Severed roots were placed in a drying oven for 48 hours at 60oC. Pruning to 9 cm removed an average of 26% of the total root mass of a typical transplant. Pruning to 5 cm removed 60% of the root mass. Immediately after trimming the roots, the transplants were placed 14" apart and planted. The plants from each treatment group were divided among four 16-plant plots arranged in a randomized block design. Following industry standards, the plots were irrigated for 10 hours a day for 10 days. The experimental trial was conducted during the 1999-2000 season and again in the 2000-2001 season.

Planting date for the 1999-2000 season was 22 Oct., and 18 Oct. for the 2000-2001 season. First harvest was 17 Dec. and 19 Dec. for the ’99-’00 and ’00-’01 season respectively. Thereafter, strawberries were harvested twice weekly until 9 Mar. both seasons. The number and weight of marketable fruit harvested were recorded. Root pruning had no detectable effect on early or total yield (Table 1). Seasonal differences in yields were evident due to the 2000-2001 season being unseasonably cold in Dec. and Jan. Apparently root regrowth is rapid during the 10-day overhead irrigation period, and an extensive initial root system is not needed for water and nutrient uptake. As the strawberry industry pursues water conservation goals, further studies will be needed to establish the exact period of overhead irrigation necessary for root establishment.

Table 1. Effect of root pruning on the yield of bare root strawberry transplants. Yields presented as g/plant.
 

Early season yield

Early season yield

Total yield

Total yield

Season

1999-2000

2000-2001

1999-2000

2000-2001

Treatment

       

Control

136

97

343

462

Roots pruned to 5 cm

136

107

408

471

Roots pruned to 9 cm

133

95

407

508

Works Cited

Darrow, G.M. 1966. The strawberry: history, breeding, and physiology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

Galletta, G.J. and D.G Himelrick (Eds) Small Fruit Crop Management. 1990. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J.

Mays G.M., M.P. Pritts, and M.J. Kelly. 1994. Seasonal patterns of growth and tissue nutrient content in strawberry. J. Plant nutrition. 17: 1149-62

White, P.R. 1927. Studies of the physiological anatomy of strawberry. J. Agric. Res. 35:481-492

Wilhelm. S., and P.E. Nelson. 1970. A concept of rootlet health of strawberries in pathogen-free field soil achieved by fumigation. P 208-215. In T.A. Toussoun, R.V. Bega, and P.E. Nelson (eds). Root diseases and soil-borne pathogen. University of California Press, Berkley.

(Elizabeth Golden and Duval, GCREC-Dover - Vegetarian 01-09)

Scheduling Drip-irrigation for Watermelon

Watermelon production in Florida amounted to 864,000,000 pounds for 27,000 acres harvested in 2000, which represented a value of $45,360,000. Because the water content of watermelon fruits is high (90 to 95%), water management is an essential part of watermelon production. On one hand, water stress may increase the incidence of blossom-end rot and may result in poorly shaped, bottleneck unmarketable fruits. On the other hand, excessive field moisture has been associated with hollow heart and movement of mobile nutrients, such as nitrate-nitrogen and potassium, out of the root zone.

Current IFAS irrigation recommendations for watermelon grown with plasticulture are to use a crop water use estimate and to keep soil water tension (SWT) between 6 and 15 cb in the 0-12 in zone. For most vegetable crops, crop evapotranspiration (ETc) may be estimated using historical or real-time weather data. Average monthly reference evapotranspiration (ET0) may be used to estimate crop evapotranspiration (ETc) by using a coefficient called crop coefficient (Kc). Another practical method to schedule irrigation is to adjust class A pan evaporation data (Ep) with a factor called crop factor (CF) to estimate ETc. Unfortunately current Kc and CF values currently available for watermelon were developed for bare ground production. Moreover, real-time ETo or Ep are seldom available.

Because growers need a practical method to schedule irrigation in real-time, this research was conducted to develop and test CF for watermelon grown with drip irrigation and plastic mulch. This report presents the preliminary results of the Spring of 2001.

Irrigation was scheduled according to the water balance method. Daily irrigation supplied the amount of water lost by evapotranspiration on the previous day. Class A pan evaporation (Ep) was daily recorded on-site (Figure 1) and a two-entry table with evaporation and crop age was used to determine the needed amount of water (Table 1). CF values of 0.20, 0.40, 0.70, 0.90 and 0.70 were selected for watermelon growth stages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. In an attempt to make scheduling practical for growers, these growth stages were the same as the ones currently used for fertilization recommendations.

Between 31 and 86 days after transplanting (DAT), SWT was monitored at the 6 and 12 in depths, twice a week (Mondays and Thursdays) before irrigation using granular matrix sensors (model 200-5, Irrometer company, Inc, Riverside, CA) and a reader (Watermark 30 KTCD-NL, Irrometer company, Inc, Riverside, CA). Sensors were placed in the four replications of N2 treatment.

Selected nitrogen (N) fertilization rates were N1, N2 and N3 and represented 75, 100 and 125% of the recommended IFAS rate, respectively. Based on soil test results using the Mehlich 1 extractant, the fertilizer recommendation rate was 150-0-150. The fertilizer injection schedule followed the recommendation of SP-170.

Testing the target CF values was done under three N rates and consisted in creating two lower and one higher water regimes than the I3 reference with values of 33%, 60% and 133% of I3 for I1, I2, and I4 respectively. The typical drip design was altered to allow separate application of water and fertilizer (Figure 2).

Five week old ‘Mardi Gras’ watermelon transplants were established on March 27 in 2001 at the North Florida Research and Education Center-Suwannee Valley (NFREC-SV) on a Lakeland sandy soil. Plots were 30-ft long and beds were on 7.5-ft centers. Distance between plants was 3 feet and each plot contained 10 plants, which created a stand of 1,815 plants/acre (Figure 3). Pest control consisted of applications of Ambush (permethrin, insecticide) six times at 10 oz/acre. Quadris FL was applied once at 12oz/acre and Bravo 81W was applied five times at 3 lbs/acre for disease control. Watermelons were harvested twice (73 and 83 DAT) and graded as marketable and cull (Figure 4).

Thanks to the modified drip system, the experimental design was a completely randomized block design with 4 replications and all factorial combination of 3 N rates and 4 irrigations regimes. Data were first analyzed using analysis of variance (SAS, 1987) and linear and quadratic orthogonal contrasts. Optimum water application rate was determined using regression analysis.

Weather during the Spring of 2001 was warm and dry, and overall favorable for watermelon production. Under these conditions, total water applied to I1, I2, I3 and I4 were 2,100, 3,800, 5,400, and 7,100 gal/100lbf, respectively. The drip system was designed so that I1, I2 and I4 represented 33%, 66% and 133% of I3, respectively. Observed water rates were numerically close to the target values (39%, 70% and 132%, respectively).

These irrigation regimes affected SWT and the magnitude of the water stress imposed to the watermelon plants (Figure 5). The number of sampling dates SWT remained within the recommended range at a 6-in depth ranged between 14 and 17 for I1 and I4, respectively. At a 12-in depth, this number ranged between 8 and 17 for I1 and I4, respectively, and increased linearly over the range of water regimes created. This suggests that the low irrigation rates (I1 and I2) maintained SWT within the recommended range less often that the high irrigation rates (I3 and I4). Similarly, the number of sampling dates that SWT was in the 15-24, 25-34 and above 34cb ranges increased from the 6-in depth to the 12-in depth, and decreased from I1 to I4.

The interaction irrigation rate x N rate was not significant for early and total marketable yield (p=0.14 and 0.75, respectively). The effect of N rate was significant for early yield (p=0.02) but not for total yield (p=0.90). Early yields were 22,444, 18,605, and 26,356 lbs/acre for N1, N2 and N3, respectively. Total marketable yields were 45,430, 44,634, and 46,385 lbs/acre for N1, N2, andN3, respectively. Mean fruit weight was 21, 21, and 22 lbs/fruit, for N1, N2, and N3, respectively. The relatively small size of the plots (30-ft each) and plants per plots (10) resulted in a relative variability larger than desirable. The observed coefficients of variations were 32% and 24% for early and total marketable yields, respectively.

The response of mean watermelon early and total marketable yield (kg/acre) to irrigation (gal/100lbf) were describe by: Total mkt. yield = -0.0002 Irr2 + 3.11 Irr + 10,150 and Early mkt. Yield = -0.0002 Irr2 + 2.53 Irr + 3,115 (Figure 6). These two quadratic equations have a downward concavity. Highest yields occurred at irrigation rates of 5,200 and 6,500 gal/season/100lbf for early and total marketable yield, respectively. As I3 corresponded to 5,400gal/season/100lbf, these values represent 96% and 120% of I3 for highest early and total marketable yield, respectively. Mean fruit weight was 20, 21, 22, and 22lbs/fruit for I1, I2, I3, and I4, respectively.

Crop coefficients for I3 were 0.20, 0.40, 0.70, 0.90, and 0.70 for stage growth 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. These preliminary SWT, yield, and fruit size results tend to support these values to schedule irrigation for watermelon using real-time class A pan evaporation data and the corresponding water application rates presented in Table 1. Results from several years will be necessary to confirm these preliminary results and fine-tune the relative value of CF for the different growth stages. 

Table 1. Water amounts (gal/100 ft) needed to replenish soil moisture for selected values of daily class A pan evaporation values for the different growth stages of watermelon.

Growth Stage1

Weeks after transplanting1

CF2

Daily Class A pan values (in)3

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

1

1 to 2

0.20

2.44

4.7

7.5

9.4

11.8

14.1

16.5

18.8

21.2

2

3 to 4

0.40

4.7

9.4

14.1

18.8

23.5

28.2

32.9

37.7

42.4

3

5 to 8

0.70

8.2

16.5

24.7

32.9

41.2

49.4

57.7

65.9

74.1

4

9 to 11

0.90

10.6

21.2

31.8

42.4

52.9

63.5

74.1

84.7

95.3

5

12 to 13

0.70

8.2

16.5

24.7

32.9

41.2

49.4

57.7

65.9

74.1

1 Stages of growth for irrigation match stages of growth of fertilizations that are describe in SP-170.
2 Crop factor for the growth stage; irrigation may be applied in excess of ETc during growth stage 1 to ensure transplant survival and stand uniformity.3 Read with a hook gauge4 in gal / 100 ft.

Eric Simonne2, Mike Dukes3, Galien Avezou1, Robert Hochmuth4, George Hochmuth, David Studstill5, and Wayne Davis6
1Exchange visitor from the Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse, avenue de l’agrobiopole, B.P.107, Auzeville, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France
2Horticultural Sciences Department, 1241 Fifield Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690
3Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, 107 Frazier Rogers Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0570
4North Florida Research & Educational Center – Suwannee Valley, 7580 County Road 136, Live Oak, FL 32060
5Horticultural Sciences Department 1241 Fifield Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690
6North Florida Research & Educational Center – Suwannee Valley, 7580 County Road 136, Live Oak, FL 32060

(Simonne, - Vegetarian 01-09)

gard butt.jpg (4544 bytes)

History of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida

Florida has a history of residency older than any other state in the Union. Early settlers arriving in the sixteenth century found native Indians already growing such vegetables as pumpkins and squash along with corn for food and trade. Spanish settlers brought citrus and other crop-introductions, and these were grown in ever expanding amounts before and after Florida officially became a Territorial state in 1821 and an "official" state in 1845.

The warm climate during the winter months gave rise to Florida becoming a leading supplier to the rest of the nation for such crops as citrus and tender vegetables. Spanish explorers brought oranges to Florida as early as 1579, and by 1835, groves a mile wide and ten miles long were known to exist.

Grapefruit was being grown in Jamaica in the 1700's and is thought to have been grown in Florida (Pinellas County) as early as 1809 by a Spaniard named Don Phillipe. However, grapefruit was not shipped north until about the 1880's.

Severe freezes took their toll on the citrus industry (notably in 1835 and again in 1894-95), forcing the industry to move southward to the Central Florida Ridge. By 1885, production had reached 5,000,000 boxes. The succeeding year, there were only 150,000 boxes! But by 1909, the crop was again 5,000,000 boxes. By 1920, orange production had increased to 10,000,000 boxes, by 1954, 128,000,000 boxes, and by 1960, almost 100,000,000 boxes were harvested from 400,000 acres of groves statewide.

The first serious canning in Florida occurred in the 1921-22 season when Polk and Street canned 9,000 boxes of grapefruit sections. By 1947-48, orange concentrate was also on the scene, with almost 2 million gallons of frozen and 1.7 million gallons of hot-pack concentrate produced. Chilled juice did not start until later, but by 1958, about 10 million boxes of oranges were squeezed for this purpose.

Other fruit-crops contributing to the total fruit-crops industry over the years have been blackberries, blueberries, grapes, peaches, pecans, persimmons, pineapples, strawberries, and such sub-tropical fruits as avocado, lychee, mangos, and papaya.

Strawberry growing began in central Florida sometime in the 1880s. The first major variety appears to have been ‘Neunan.’ It was replaced by ‘Klondike’ ( c.1900), which was replaced by ‘Missionary’ (c.1910), then by ‘Florida 90.’

Vegetables

The production of vegetables followed the migration of pioneer settlers into Florida. As they came, they grew vegetables for home consumption, then pioneered regional production of crops that eventually vaulted Florida into the country’s winter vegetable capital. Most of these crops were first brought to this country by immigrants. Cowpeas (Southern peas) arrived with slaves from Africa. Although pepper is native to tropical America, seeds were carried to Spain by Columbus in 1493, then on to the United States by European immigrants.

Little official data are available prior to the establishment of the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station at Lake City in 1888. However, that year it was estimated that the gross value of Florida vegetables was 2 ½ million dollars.

Research on watermelons was initiated at the Station that year. Jasper P. DePass wrote a bulletin on growing cabbage for home use in 1887. Florida’s Commissioner of Agriculture reported for the period 1901-1905 an average of almost 2,000 acres of cabbage per year.

Commercial production of potatoes developed in the 1890's in the Hastings area of north Florida. By 1900, 1,700 acres of potatoes were growing in Florida, according to the USDA Yearbook of Agriculture in 1900. (By mid-century, the acreage of potatoes had risen to 36,000 acres, with a gross value of $16,000,000).

Likewise, Florida’s leading vegetable, the tomato, was being shipped to northern cities prior to 1890. Tomatoes grown in Bradenton were shipped to Cedar Key by boat, then across the state and on north by rail.

After the disastrous freeze of 1895 killed out the citrus, many of these growers sought new money crops, and other crop-industries were born. S.O. Chase grew celery near Sanford in 1895, and was followed by B.F. Whitner who brought celery from Michigan to plant in 1896.In 1897, celery was shipped to Jacksonville by J.H. Terwilliger, and on to New York. In 1899, four cars were marketed. By 1960, the major acreage had shifted southward to Palm Beach County but had increased to 11,000 acres producing 11,000 cars.

From these humble beginnings, many other crops have contributed to a thriving vegetable industry: beans, carrots, cucumbers, sweet corn, eggplant, endive, lettuce, muskmelons, okra, onions, sweet potatoes, radish, and many minor crops like cooking greens.

The value of vegetables was greater than for citrus until about 1910. Afterward, citrus was generally king, although there were years when the value of vegetables exceeded that of citrus. The chart below for 1939 will show them about equal.

Leading Ten Florida Vegetables, 1939

Beans, snap and lima - $6,139,000
Tomatoes - $5,082,000
Celery - $3,329,000
Irish potatoes - $2,868,000
Strawberries - $2,511,000
Peppers - $1,313,000
Cabbage - $986,000
Cucumbers - $682,000
Green peas - $610,000
Watermelons - $509,000
Total $25,000,000 value of Truck Crops
Total $27,000,000 value for Citrus

In 1952, cash receipts from vegetables was 162 million versus 129 million for citrus. But by 1954, there was a more normal relationship when vegetables brought in 145 million compared to 188 million for citrus. And by the end of the 20th century, vegetables produced from 300,000 acres were worth about 1.5 billion dollars.

Vegetable Gardening. Through the early years most Florida families grew a vegetable garden for home use. In 1947, 4-H girls completed 3,500 garden projects while the boys completed about 2,000 gardens.

Academic Development

Florida’s first governor was Andrew Jackson (1821). Its first territorial governor was William DuVal (1822). After it was granted official statehood in 1845, William Moseley became its first statehood governor.

The higher education system in Florida goes back to 1853 when Gov. Thomas Broome created East Florida Seminary in Ocala. Then, in 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Morrill Act which granted each state land to be sold to perpetuate colleges of agriculture, mechanical arts, and military sciences. But it was not until 1884 that Florida was able to take advantage of this act and establish its own college. It was called the "Florida Agricultural College," (FAC) and was established in October 1884 at Lake City.

The Florida Agricultural Experiment Station

In March 1887, the federal Hatch Act provided for an agricultural experiment station to be established at each of these state colleges. As a result, in 1888, the "Florida Agricultural Experiment Station" became a part of the Lake City FAC. (Incidentally, 1888 was also the year the Florida State Horticultural Society began).

The Station’s first director was J. Kost, who was soon to be replaced in 1889 by The Reverend Jasper P. DePass of Archer, Florida.. In 1893, Oscar Clute became both director of the Station and president of FAC. In August 1897, Clute resigned and was replaced by W.F. Yocum, a former president of FAC.

President/Director Yocum held the dual position until 1901, when Dr. T.H. Taliaferro became President of FAC and director of the Experiment Station. Dr. Taliaferro, from the Ivy League schools, broadened the academic curriculum beyond agriculture, and named James M. Farr, history professor, as the first football coach of FAC.

In 1903, under Governor Jennings, the name "Florida Agricultural College" was changed to "University of Florida." That year, Dr.Taliaferro resigned and was replaced by Dr. Andrew Sledd for both director and president. In the fall of 1905, the University opened its doors in Lake City with 24 instructors and 136 co-ed students.

The State Buckman Act was passed in 1905. As a result, Gainesville was selected as the new home for both the University and the Agricultural Experiment Station.

In February 1906, the positions of Station Director and University President were separated.. Dr. Sledd continued as President and Dr. P.H. Rolfs was appointed as Director of the Station

Thomas Hall was the first building on the new campus, and in December 1906, the Station’s library was moved into it. Dr. Sledd moved into it the following month (January, 1907).

In 1909, Director Rolfs moved the Station into a newly constructed building first called the Agricultural Experiment Station building, which later was named Newell Hall.

In 1915, Station Director Rolfs took on two other important agricultural positions- that of Dean of the College and head of the brand new Agricultural Extension Service (founded by the Smith-Lever Act of 1914). Rolfs served in this multiple fashion until he resigned in 1921.

Rolfs was replaced in 1921 by entomologist Dr. Wilmon Newell, who was the commissioner of the State Plant Board. Thus, Dr. Newell now held four administrative positions: dean of the College, director of the Station, director of the Extension Service, and commissioner of the State Plant Board, all of which he held until his death in October, 1943.

Upon the death of Dr. Newell in 1943, four appointees were named to head the four agencies. Harold H. Mowry was a Horticulturist who became director of the Station, a position he held until he retired in January, 1950. In May, 1950, Willard M. Fifield became the new director of the Agricultural Experiment Station.

In May, 1950, Dr. Joseph R. Beckenbach was reassigned to Gainesville as Associate Director. When Director Fifield was promoted to Provost for Agriculture in June 1955, Dr. Beckenbach became Station director.

In 1959, Dr. John Sites moved from the Chairmanship of the Fruit Crops Department into the Experiment Station office as Associate Director. Then, when Dr. Beckenbach retired in 1967, Dr. Sites became the new Director of Research (IFAS). Today: Dean for Research is Dr. Richard L. Jones.

Florida Cooperative Extension Service. In 1915, the Florida legislature reacted to the Federal Smith-Lever Act by establishing the Florida Cooperative Extension Service. This was based on a memorandum of understanding between the USDA and the University of Florida. The purpose of Extension was to take the knowledge base of the Experiment Station to the farms, markets, homes, and people of America. In 1915, Dr. P. H. Rolfs, who was serving as Director of the Experiment Station, took on the additional role of Florida’s first director of the Extension Service. Dr. A.P. Spencer became Rolfs’s Extension Assistant in 1917; Assisted Newell 1930-1935, then became Extension’s director 1943-1947. Mr. H.G. Clayton became Extension’s Director in 1947 and served until retirement in 1956.

Until 1948 there was not a vegetable specialist on the Extension staff. In 1948, Dr. F.S. Jamison’s appointment was split into one-half Extension and one-half research so that he could pull together all the work State-wide on vegetables. Today: Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Dean for Extension is Dr. Christine T. Waddill.

The College of Agriculture (Teaching). The basic degree granting unit for the University’s agricultural programs has been the College of Agriculture. The first class graduated in 1889 and contained three students, followed by the second class of five students in 1892. The first class at Gainesville contained 102 students, mostly male, for the Florida State College for Women opened in Tallahassee the same year.

In 1915, Dr. P.H. Rolfs , in addition to his Research Director’s role, was made Dean of the College of Agriculture and Director of the newly-created Agricultural Extension Service. He was replaced in this role by Dr. Newell in 1921, who served until his death in 1943.Then in 1950 Dr. C.V. Noble was Dean of the College ( Dr. Nettles married the Dean’s daughter, Grace). In 1955, Dr. Marvin Brooker became Dean of the College, followed by George Thornton, Marvin Brooker, Charles Browning, Gerald Zacharia, and Larry Conner. Today: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Dean, Dr. Jimmy G. Cheek.

Provost for Agriculture. As can be seen from the discussion so far, the early leaders of the agricultural units assumed multiple administrative head-roles, but were not called "provosts.". In 1949, Dr. J. Wayne Reitz, a USDA economist, became the first so-called Provost for Agriculture. Dr.Reitz served as Provost until becoming University President in 1955. Replacing Reitz as Provost that same year was Dr. Willard M. Fifield, who was promoted from Research Director. He held this position until 1961, at which time Dr. Marvin Brooker, Dean of the College, became interim Provost. In 1963, Dr. E.T. York,Jr. was hired as Provost, and effectively reorganized the entire system into the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (1964).

Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). In April, 1964, the Florida Board of Control approved the creation of IFAS. This action organized the four major agricultural units of the University into a single budgetary and administrative unit- IFAS. These included the Experiment Station, the Extension Service, the Agricultural College, and the School of Forestry.

Instead of "Provost" the new title became "Vice President." The first Vice President for Agricultural Affairs was Dr. E.T. York, Jr., the 1964 Provost for Agriculture. His three designated administrators were already on the job in 1964: Dean of Extension, Dr. M.O. Watkins; Dean for Research, Dr. J.R. Beckenbach; and Dean for Resident Instruction, Dr. Marvin Brooker. Today: Vice President for Agricultural and Natural Resources is Dr. Michael V. Martin.

Branch Stations

Before any history of the Horticultural Sciences Department can be continued, the historical development of the branch research stations must be addressed.. Over the years, there has been strong interaction between these branch research stations and the departments on the main campus. However, initially branch stations were independently funded.

Citrus Station. The oldest of the branches of the Agricultural Experiment Station is the Florida Citrus Experiment Station, established by the Florida legislature in 1917. Polk County growers provided 84 acres near Lake Alfred for the Station in 1919. In 1926, the first permanent structures were built from legislative funds. At first, the Station was operated out of Gainesville. Later, staff members working on citrus were stationed near the Station. In 1936, Dr. A.F. Camp became Horticulturist in Charge of the Citrus Station until 1956. In 1982, Dr. Walt Kender became Center director, serving until 1996. Today: Citrus REC- Lake Alfred. Director is Dr. Harold W. Browning. The staff includes 62 faculty working on citrus.

Everglades Station. The Station was authorized in 1921 on 160 acres three miles east of Belle Glade. In 1931, land area was increased to 800 acres. In 1960, 320 more acres were added for animal research. Dr. R.V. Allison was placed in charge in 1929. He was